植入式左心室辅助系统不良事件风险分析

      Risk Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices

      • 摘要:
        目的 基于国内外多源监测数据,系统分析植入式左心室辅助系统(left ventricular assist system,LVAD)的不良事件与召回特征,为临床安全与监管优化提供参考。
        方法 数据来源于浙江省内上报2例死亡报告、国家药品监督管理局注册及召回信息(2起),以及美国食品药品监督管理局MAUDE 数据库(36581份报告)和召回数据库(23起)。采用描述性统计、根本原因分析、德尔菲法及风险矩阵相结合的策略。
        结果 LVAD类产品上市后故障类表现共18772例次,以泵功能异常(14.25%)、电能问题(12.44%)、流道阻塞(12.10%)、报警/控制系统(10.80%)为主;伤害类表现共29509例次,死亡占29.77%,感染占16.09%,脏器衰竭/脑血管意外/卒中占13.52%,出血占9.77%,血栓形成占5.96%。中美共25起召回中,Ⅰ级召回占52%,根本原因主要为设计缺陷和制造过程偏差,两者占比超过60%。浙江省内1例死亡与控制器更换中血泵非预期停转相关,风险矩阵显示泵内血栓/流道阻塞、泵功能异常处于不可接受区。
        结论 LVAD作为挽救终末期心衰患者生命的第三类高风险植入式医疗器械,其真实世界风险集中于设备故障(泵功能异常、电能问题、流道阻塞)与严重伤害(死亡、感染、脏器衰竭/脑血管意外/卒中、出血、血栓),召回多源于设计与制造缺陷。建议注册人强化全生命周期管理与冗余设计,医疗机构规范不良事件上报,监管部门加强重点监测。

         

        Abstract:
        Objective Based on multi-source monitoring data from both domestic and international sources, this study systematically analyzes the adverse events and recall characteristics associated with implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) to provide a reference for clinical safety and regulatory optimization.
        Methods The data were sourced from two fatality reports submitted in Zhejiang Province, registration and recall information from the National Medical Products Administration (2 cases), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database (36,581 reports) and recall database (23 cases). A strategy combining descriptive statistics, root cause analysis (RCA), the Delphi method, and a risk matrix was employed.
        Results There were a total of 18,772 post-market malfunction-related events involving LVAD products, primarily involving pump malfunction (14.25%), electrical issues (12.44%), flow path obstruction (12.10%), and alarm/control system issues (10.80%); There were a total of 29,509 reported cases of patient injury-related events, with deaths accounting for 29.77%, infections for 16.09%, organ failure/cerebrovascular accidents/strokes for 13.52%, bleeding for 9.77%, and thrombosis for 5.96%. Among the 25 recalls in China and the U.S., Class I recalls accounted for 52%. The root causes were primarily design defects and manufacturing process deviations, which together accounted for over 60%. One fatality in Zhejiang Province was related to an unexpected shutdown of the blood pump during a controller replacement; the risk matrix indicated that blood clots within the pump and flow path blockages, as well as pump malfunctions, were in the unacceptable zone.
        Conclusion  As a Class Ⅲ high-risk implantable medical device that saves the lives of patients with end-stage heart failure, the real-world risks associated with LVADs primarily involve device malfunctions (pump malfunction, electrical issues, and flow path obstruction) and serious adverse events (death, infection, organ failure/cerebrovascular accident/stroke, bleeding, and thrombosis); recalls are often attributed to design and manufacturing defects. It is recommended that registrants strengthen lifecycle management and incorporate redundant designs, that healthcare institutions standardize the reporting of adverse events, and that regulatory authorities enhance targeted monitoring.

         

      /

      返回文章
      返回